Sunday, January 20, 2013

No Budget No Pay


#NoBudgetNoPay: With Debt Undermining Our Economy, a Budget Should Be Passed that Cuts Spending
JANUARY 20, 2013 | VIEW ONLINE

If you think Members of Congress should have to pass a budget before they get paid, watch and share the weekly Republican address with Rep. James Lankford (R-OK):
To give Congress time to pass a budget, the House of Representatives will vote this week on a temporary three-month debt limit increase. But if the House or Senate fails to pass a budget in that time, Members of Congress will not be paid. Here are some facts to remember:
  • “We should cut Washington's budget, not your family’s budget,” says Rep. Lankford. House Republicans have already passed two budgets that cut spending and address our debt. Rep. Lankford says the House will pass another one to “pay our bills and keep the government running” – one that “walks our nation out of debt, deficit and decline.”
SHARE   Google+ Facebook Twitter

1 comment:

Larry Killion said...



boehner_hill_121212.jpg

FILE: Dec. 12, 2012: House Speaker John Boehner speaks during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington. (AP)

House Republicans might run into a snag in trying to suspend congressional pay as a way to nudge budget negotiations along: the U.S. Constitution.

As part of a proposal to raise the debt limit for three months, the House GOP would suspend pay for members of Congress unless both the House and the Senate pass a budget blueprint for the next fiscal year.

The measure plays to public disaffection with Congress, which has been locked in a bitter spending battle, and appeals to the small-government wing of the Republican Party, which doesn’t like government spending to begin with. It is also a dig at Senate Democrats, who have gone for years without adopting a budget plan.

The problem is that immediately withholding pay from lawmakers may be unconstitutional. The 27th amendment states no law changing compensation for members of the House or the Senate can take effect until after the next House election. That means a law, even if it were to clear the Democratic-controlled Senate, which is a long shot, could not be used to withhold pay for almost two years.

To read more from The Wall Street Journal, click here:

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/01/19/possible-snag-for-republicans-no-pay-budget-plan/#ixzz2IanUQNe7