Sunday, June 30, 2013

Call to Fall.

TLBC: Gods Call to Fall. LJK   
audio clip

2Chronicles 7:13-14

The book of Joel is an interesting parallel to our text.  There are certain things America faces today that relate to it all.  Our economy is in frail condition indeed.  The DOW, as a key market indicator, is in a very volatile condition. We are surely living in a time of pestilences.  The formula for recovery for the Hebrew people was in verse 14 of our text and the same is so today for our land.  Let us consider for a few moments God’s call to fall on our knees in repentant prayer according to our text and in the book of Joel.  We will notice four points:  The Hurt, The Heart, The How, and The Hope.

Persuasion for Prayer.

Persuasion for Prayer. LJK
audio clip 

Persuasion for Prayer  Matt.21:22, Mk.11:24. Pray.  In the days just prior to the betrayal and crucifixion of Christ, He did a miracle regarding a fig tree. The disciples were so amazed by the miracle that He used it to teach them a lesson on faith and prayer.  Faith is a very important part of prayer and if we pray properly, faith says to God, “I know God can do what I cannot do, God can do the impossible.”  It is faith that is the persuading part of our prayer.  God will do what we ask Him to do in prayer because of the faith that we have in Him to do it.  Consider two things about the “Persuasion for Prayer.” 

Saturday, June 29, 2013

Going too FAR


Police confiscate guns from flooded town

'We put them in a place that we control and that they're safe'

The town flooded, and the police came in, evacuated the population … and then confiscated the residents’ guns out of their empty houses.

The residents of High River, Alberta, population nearly 13,000, are still awaiting authorities’ permission to return to their homes. Dozens have been engaged in a standoff with the Royal Canadian Mounted Police at a checkpoint at the edge of town since floodwaters prompted a forced evacuation last week.
Several news sources report tensions are high since news broke police have also been gathering residents’ firearms.

“I find that absolutely incredible that they have the right to go into a person’s belongings out of their home,” resident Brenda Lackey told the Calgary Herald. “When people find out about this, there’s going to be untold hell to pay.”

“This is the reason the U.S. has the right to bear arms,” said Charles Timpano at the checkpoint, where he and others have gathered to demand reentry into High River.
Video of the standoff can be seen below:
The police, thus far, insist the gun confiscation is only for the citizens’ safety and that the firearms will be returned.

“We just want to make sure that all of those things are in a spot that we control, simply because of what they are,” Sgt. Brian Topham told the Herald. “People have a significant amount of money invested in firearms … so we put them in a place that we control and that they’re safe.”
Alberta Premier Alison Redford defended the action: “I think what we need to understand is these are exceptional circumstances. … In an emergency situation we need to have our police ensuring there is law and order.”

The RCMP further released a written statement explaining owners wouldn’t want their firearms to “fall into the wrong hands” during the evacuation and pledging to return guns to owners “as soon as practically possible.”

The statement said the guns were found “in plain view” during search and rescue operations, a potential problem, since Canadian law requires gun owners keep firearms in locked vaults or containers.
Yet Solicitor General Jonathan Denis has suggested the owners aren’t likely to face prosecution.
“My personal view is we have to consider the context we’re dealing with,” Denis said in an interview Friday. “I wouldn’t be surprised people took guns out of their lockers so they wouldn’t get flooded.”
He added, “I will work with the RCMP to ensure there’s an orderly return of property.”

Sgt. Topham told the Herald the confiscated guns have been inventoried and are secured at an RCMP detachment. He would not specify how many firearms had been confiscated, only that “a large quantity” had been taken because they were “left by residents in their places.”  The guns will be returned to owners after residents are allowed back in town and they provide proof of ownership, Topham added.  CBC News reports local officials have announced some residents will be allowed to return to their homes on Saturday.

Friday, June 28, 2013

Jihadist in WH

ACLJ Take Action  |  Contribute

  Like this on Facebook

Obama Administration support for the Muslim Brotherhood is out of control.
Yesterday we learned that Sheikh Abdullah Bin Bayyah met with key members of President Obama's national security team, in the White House.
The problem? Abdullah Bin Bayyah is a jihadist, affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood.
In 2004, his organization, the International Union of Muslim Scholars, issued a fatwa – a Muslim religious directive – declaring that it was the duty of Muslims to kill American soldiers in Iraq.
His organization supports suicide bombing of Israeli civilians, and its president has praised the Holocaust.
And now he's come to the White House to ask the Obama Administration to arm jihadists in Syria.
Enough is enough. We need at least 200,000 Americans to speak with one voice. No support for jihad. No support for the Muslim Brotherhood.
Sign the petition to sequester the Muslim Brotherhood.
Jay Sekulow
ACLJ Chief Counsel
Contribute Now

no, No, NO! Enuff already

Amnesty?  You gotta be kidding me!

See the latest stats and numbers HERE

Thursday, June 27, 2013

Supreme Confusion

June 27, 2013
The Confusion of the Supreme Court

by Joseph Backholm | Executive Director FPI of WA

By now you know that the Supreme Court struck down section 3 of the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in the case United States v. Windsor.
  Supreme Court
While this was one small step for the Supreme Court, it represents one giant leap for make-it-up-as-you-go judicial decisions and exposes the fact that the Supreme Court is not inoculated from the hyper-political, cultural debate surrounding marriage.  
Proponents of natural marriage feared that the Supreme Court would issue a Roe v. Wade of marriage by declaring a constitutional right to marry someone of the same gender and removing the debate from the political process. In some ways, however, this case could be worse than Roe because of its incoherence.
Typically, the Supreme Court gives a real life, legal reason for its decisions. But in this case, the Court did what all good politicians do -- use a large number of words to say nothing useful all in the name of getting what you want.
Here are the legal arguments the Court didn't use to support their conclusion that DOMA is unconstitutional.

First, the court refused to say there is a constitutional right to marry someone of the same gender.  This is significant because the primary political argument of those wanting to redefine marriage is that "marriage equality" is a constitutional right.   Even this court acknowledged that isn't the case, though I doubt the legal reality will catch up with the campaigns any time soon.  Why let reality get in the way of a good slogan?  Strike one.

Second, the court did not say DOMA violates the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment.   They certainly discussed the equal protection clause and leaned heavily on some amorphous concept of equality.  However, they refused to go down the well-worn path of equal protection analysis to determine whether DOMA violated it because they knew that they would not find what they were looking for-a reason to throw out DOMA.  Strike two.

Third, the court did not say DOMA violates the Fifth Amendments due process clause.  Due process is the idea that government can't deny liberty without due process.   Much of the commentary about this case suggests that the Fifth Amendment is the justification the Court used, but in reality they declined to do so.  The majority acknowledged the precedent saying that due process protects substantive rights only when they are deeply rooted in our nation's history and traditions.  That clearly excludes same-sex "marriage", which had never existed in any jurisdiction on the planet prior to 14 years ago.

It is the opposite of a deeply rooted substantive right. Strike three. 

Fourth, the court did not say that DOMA violates family law jurisdiction. The opinion begins with a red herring discussion of the fact that family law has historically (but not exclusively) been left to states.  The implication the court wanted to create is that DOMA, from its origin, was an overreach of federal power into state matters. Yet it refuses to strike DOMA down on that basis.  Why?  DOMA has never had any impact on state family law and they know that.  To the contrary, it controls only how the federal government allocates federal money and benefits when it comes to marriage, which is clearly within Congress' power.   Strike four?

So, if there is no constitutional right to same-sex "marriage", if DOMA doesn't violate equal protection or due process, nor does it overreach into the state's domain of family law, then why did they decide that it was unconstitutional for Congress to define marriage as a relationship between a man and a woman and still allow the states to do so? 

Because they wanted to.

What is obvious in their language is that they like same-sex marriage. So in place of legal arguments, the Court relied entirely on its belief that their position on gay marriage is morally superior to that of Congress circa 1996.

From their perspective, DOMA must have been motivated by a "bare desire to harm," or "to disparage and to injure."  They further explained that its sole purpose and effect is to "impose inequality," to deny "equal dignity," and "humiliate."

What more of an explanation do you need, bigot?

In the place of legal reasoning, the court effectively creates a precedent for doing whatever it want so long as it feels justified.  If you are more interested in the outcome than respecting our separation of powers, that's precisely what you were looking for. Lawsuits claiming state DOMA's are unconstitutional have repeatedly failed because there is no legal precedent to support their position.  However, new legal challenges to state DOMA's are likely to ensue and we can be sure that those lawsuits will quote liberally from the majorities' sermon/opinion in this case.  

The strange scenario they left us with, in which federal tax law is now different from state to state, and where it is constitutional for a state to define marriage as a relationship between a man and a woman but unconstitutional for Congress to do the same, is the work of a political body trying to reach a political outcome.   The problem is, that isn't what the Supreme Court is supposed to do.

All the while, they assure us that they were not trying to say that there is a constitutional right to same-sex "marriage". 

Justice Scalia's response to this position in his dissent will close this discussion well:

"It takes real cheek for today's majority to assure us, as it is going out the door, that a constitutional requirement to give formal recognition to same-sex marriage is not at issue here-when what has preceded that assurance is a lecture on how superior the majority's moral judgment in favor of same-sex marriage is to the Congress's hateful moral judgment against it. I promise you this: The only thing that will "confine" the Court's holding is its sense of what it can get away with."

$5000 Penalty For Hiring Citizens Over Legalized Aliens

Ted Cruz Exposes Amnesty Bill: $5000 Penalty For Hiring Citizens Over Legalized Aliens : Freedom Outpost

Another case of passing a "comprehensive" bill without actually reading it.  Obama-care revisited... 

WHEN will my fellow patriots help me vote these idiots out of office?  

Stand for Biblical Marriage

Championing Pastors to Transform America

Dear Pastor Killion,
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled on two marriage cases: United States v. Windsor which involved a challenge to the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) and Hollingsworth v. Perry, which came to the Court out of the Proposition 8 (California Marriage Amendment) litigation in California.
As a result, many have questions about the ramifications of these rulings for marriage, family and the church as we go forward. We have developed a FREE Bulletin Insert on the Supreme Court rulings and how the church should respond. Simply click on the link to download, print double-sided, and distribute in your Worship Folder, Bulletin, or at your Welcome Center or other high traffic area.
Obviously, there is a Higher Court of Appeal whom our nation's Founders addressed as the "Supreme Judge of the World." That is the Court before which you and I have been appointed to serve as advocates, under the authority of our Chief Advocate, the Lord Jesus Christ.
For more, visit our StandForMarriage resource page, which has other tools to help your voice be heard on marriage as God has forever defined it.
Standing for Faith, Family and Freedom,

Dr. Kenyn M. Cureton
Vice President for Church Ministries
Family Research Council

Senate Passes Amnesty

Senate Passes S.744 Amnesty

What just happened:
Shortly before 1 p.m., 68 Senators voted for S. 744 in the all-important final cloture vote. It needed 60 votes. This assures its final passage by the Senate (only 50 votes needed) later today. (See who voted for cloture below.)
The bad news:
If eventually signed into law, this bill would threaten to knock millions of Americans out of the middle class by flooding their occupations with 33 million foreign citizens who are offered lifetime work permits over the next decade. Can you believe 68 U.S. Senators voted for that?
The willingness of every single Democratic Senator and almost a third of Republicans to accept the corporate lobbyists' insistence that our country faces devastating labor shortages is disheartening to all of us who have fought so hard to protect the 20 million Americans who can't find a full-time job, and the millions more who have seen their real wages declining for decades during a worker surplus.
What's next, and the good news about your efforts thus far:
Now, we must turn our full efforts to the U.S. House of Representatives and another huge grassroots effort in July. But this will be only a three-week fight before the month-long August recess.
There is no question that the five-month opposition that all of you have waged is having good results in the House, where the Senate bill is facing an increasingly hostile reception.
If the House refuses to move a giant overall amnesty, it doesn't matter what the Senate has done.
For all of you who have spent so much of your time recently in this fight, you need a respite. I urge you to take a bit of a breather from activism this next week, celebrate our nation's Independence Day, enjoy your families and friends. You've earned it.
As for today, it sure would be great if you took a moment to make an on-line donation to re-build the C-4 activism political battle fund for our big July House Battle!

For example, Republican Bob Corker, the Senator who rescued the S. 744 amnesty from defeat last week with a fig-leaf border control amendment, admitted on the floor this morning that the bill is extremely unpopular back in his state of Tennessee.
All of us at NumbersUSA thank you for everything you have done thus far. And we thank you for all Americans who will benefit if the House blocks the incredibly harmful provisions of S. 744.
Even if the House passes an absolutely wonderful immigration bill -- such as the enforcement legislation recently passed overwhelmingly by the Judiciary Committee -- that would give Senate leaders the opportunity to ask for a joint Senate/House "Conference Committee" which would split the difference between that very good bill and the Senate monstrosity.
If a Conference compromise bill were to include an amnesty, both the Senate and House would need to vote for it, without opportunity for amendment. The general thinking here in Washington is that most House Democrats would vote for the Conference "report" bill and very likely the needed couple dozen or so House Republicans would, too..
We must re-build our battle funds for the July fight.
Help us re-build our battle funds for the July fight.

 Today, 68 Senators cast votes that will be very difficult to ever redeem with future actions.

After all the promises of "enforcement first," these Senators accepted an entirely "amnesty first" bill that in the first few months would give work permits and legalization to some 11 million foreign citizens who either (a) crossed the border illegally, most of them by paying drug cartels and many of them by helping the cartels move drugs, or who (b) violated the promises on their vacation and guest visas and illegally took U.S. jobs (often through identity theft and fraud) and a share of the taxpayer-provided infrastructure.
Every single Democratic Senator voted YES to the amnesty and to the arguments of corporate lobbyists that a nation -- with 20 million Americans unable to find full-time jobs in a country plagued with labor shortages -- must give out 33 million new lifetime work permits to foreign citizens over the next decade.
And these Republican Senators voted YES to the same provisions, breaking with the majority of their Party and all their Party leaders in the Senate:
Alexander (R-TN)
Ayotte (R-NH)
Chiesa (R-NJ)
Collins (R-ME)
Corker (R-TN)
Flake (R-AZ)
Graham (R-SC)
Hatch (R-UT)
Heller (R-NV)
Hoeven (R-ND)
Kirk (R-IL)
McCain (R-AZ)
Murkowski (R-AK)
Rubio (R-FL)

Wednesday, June 26, 2013

SCOTUS ruling on marriage

June 26, 2013
Statement Regarding SCOTUS Marriage Decision

Joseph Backholm, executive director of the Family Policy Institute of Washington, released the following statement regarding the Supreme Court's decision on marriage:

"The Supreme Court got it wrong when it said that the state can tell the federal government how it must define marriage. The federal government, on behalf of those who elected them, should be able to recognize the unique value of relationships that provide children a mother and father."

"However, those who want to redefine marriage suffered an important defeat today. The Supreme Court refused to declare a constitutional right to same-sex "marriage," and rejected their request to impose a redefinition of marriage on all fifty states.  This decision means that this important debate will continue state by state across the country."

More details and analysis will follow as they become available.

You can find on-going analysis of the Supreme Court's decision by going to the following resources:

Proud? Safe?

Dear Proud American,

Take a long, hard look above...

These are the people who represent you... who represent America.

How does that make you feel?



Personally, it makes me feel sick.

This isn't the America I know and love. This isn't the America my ancestors staked their lives for.

Today, Big Government reign is enslaving our freedoms.

It can punish you for your political affiliation...

It can listen in on your personal phone calls, read your emails, spy on your every move without court authorization...

Big Government reign decides who lives, and who dies.

It can even kill you right where you stand, without trial.

Worst of all, it's so easy to get away with.

Take another look above... think about all they've gotten away with... all the blood on their hands.

Now let me ask you one last question - will you help me do something about it?

I can't stomach our "leaders" lying through their teeth one second longer. It's time to tell Congress enough is enough!

It's time to demand that Congress impeach this pack of corrupt, degenerate thugs, before it gets any worse. Because personally, I don't want to see what "worse" looks like...

Let's take a stand in favor of America's restoration. The America our forefathers built.

Sign Capitol Hill Daily's petition to impeach Barack Obama and help us put an end to the destruction of civil liberty once and for all.

The Constitution is worthless if we don't do everything we can to enforce it.



Martin Biancuzzo
Senior Political Analyst, Capitol Hill Daily

How to get shot

California Man Facing Possible Charges For Defending Himself And His Son

Tuesday, June 25, 2013

Arizona Voters TICKED

Arizona Voters Look To Recall Sens. McCain & Flake Following Amnesty Vote : Freedom Outpost

Farm Kid joins Marines

Dear Ma and Pa,
I am well.  Hope you are. Tell Brother Walt and Brother Elmer the Marine Corps beats working for old man Minch by a mile. Tell them to join up quick before all of the places are filled.
I was restless at first because you get to stay in bed till nearly 6 a.m. But I am getting so I like to sleep late. Tell Walt and Elmer all you do before breakfast is smooth your cot, and shine some things.  No hogs to slop, feed to pitch, mash to mix, wood to split, fire to lay. Practically nothing.
Men got to shave but it is not so bad, there's warm water.
Breakfast is strong on trimmings like fruit juice, cereal, eggs, bacon, etc., but kind of weak on chops, potatoes, ham, steak, fried eggplant, pie and other regular food, but tell Walt and Elmer you can always sit by the two city boys that live on coffee. Their food,  plus yours,  holds you until noon  when you get fed again. It's no wonder these city boys can't walk much.
We go on 'route marches,' which the platoon sergeant says are long walks to harden us.  If he thinks so, it's not my place to tell him different. A 'route march' is about as far as to our mailbox at home. Then the city guys get sore feet and we all ride back in trucks.
The sergeant is like a school teacher.  He nags a lot.  The Captain is like the school board.   Majors and colonels just ride around and frown. They don't bother you none.
This next will kill Walt and Elmer with laughing.  I keep getting medals for shooting.   I don't know why.  The bulls-eye is near as big as a chipmunk head and don't move, and it ain't shooting at you like the Higgett boys at home.  All you got to do is lie there all comfortable and hit it.  You don't even load your own cartridges They come in boxes.
Then we have what they call hand-to-hand combat training.  You get to wrestle with them city boys.  I have to be real careful though, they break real easy.  It ain't like fighting with that ole bull at home.  I'm about the best they got in this except for that Tug Jordan from over in Silver Lake . I only beat him once..  He joined up the same time as me, but I'm only 5'6' and 130 pounds and he's 6'8' and near 300 pounds dry.
Be sure to tell Walt and Elmer to hurry and join before other fellers get onto this setup and come stampeding in.
Your loving daughter,


15 Republicans Vote WITH Reid Advance Fake Border Security
At 5:30 p.m. yesterday, the Obama Democrat-controlled Senate VOTED to END DEBATE on Gang of Eight Amnesty Hoeven-Corker Amendment S. 744 with NO ONE having READ the 1200-PAGE BILL!
If not stopped, S. 744 will destroy self-governing America with an influx of more foreign labor during record high unemployment and forgiveness of 12 million lawbreakers – all while NOT securing our sovereign borders but instead establishing a permanent globalist, progressive majority!
The Hoeven-Corker "fool the voter" border security amendment to the contentious immigration bill cleared a procedural hurdle when the Senate voted 67 to 27 on Monday night to invoke cloture, end debate and move the amendment forward. This sets up the Hoeven-Corker amendment for a pass-fail vote later in the week.
Now we're hearing that Harry Reid is going to force the next vote to adopt the amendment, and another to invoke cloture on the whole bill – TO GET S. 744 TO THE FLOOR FOR A SIMPLE MAJORITY VOTE – THIS WEEK in order to meet his July 4th deadline for handing S. 744 over to RAM THROUGH the House!
With more votes expected as early as TOMORROW, we must use TODAY to reprimand and RALLY THE GOP and even moderate Democrats and Independents to REJECT S.744 AND SAVE AMERICAN SOVEREIGNTY!


Championing Pastors to Transform America

This Sunday, June 30th, is the 5th annual observance of the Call2Fall, which is based on God's "call to fall" in humble, repentant prayer in 2 Chronicles 7:14. Nearly 1.6 million believers from thousands of churches in all 50 states will spend at least 5 minutes on our knees in prayer for our nation.
The website has many FREE tools and resources for pastors and church leaders, including Sermon Starters, Bulletin Insert, PowerPoint announcements, videos, etc.
Please help us get the word out during these last days before June 30th. Download the short video clips and share them with your church. Pass them on to pastors and prayer leaders you know have a heart to see America turn to God in prayer. Share the links with your Facebook friends and point them to Call2Fall's Website and Facebook page.
Watch our short video about the first prayer in the Continental Congress. At another desperate time in our nation's history, that pastor-led prayer moved many of our Founding Fathers to their knees and even to tears. Like these great men, my prayer is that we will declare our dependence upon God--even as we celebrate our independence. .
Please join us by setting aside just a few minutes in your worship services this Sunday and lead your congregation in prayer -- all who are able on their knees -- to cry out to God for our nation. And it is appropriate for us to do it on the Sunday before the Fourth of July, before we break out the picnic gear, fire up the grill, and light the fireworks to celebrate our nation's birthday.
Again, visit to sign up your church. By joining us, believers in your community who are looking for a participating church can find you. As we unite our hearts and cry out to God, He will hear our prayers and respond.
Kneeling for Faith, Family and Freedom,

Dr. Kenyn M. Cureton
Vice President for Church Ministries
Family Research Council

Monday, June 24, 2013

LifeNews Pro-Life News Update

For news updated throughout the day, visit
Current Headlines

• Harry Reid Challenged to Allow Vote on Late-Term Abortion Ban
• Senate Democrats Blast Late-Term Abortion Ban After House Passage

• Democrats: Banning Late-Term Abortions is “Stupid, Offensive, Cowardly, Cruel”
Sponsor of 20-Week Abortion Ban Had “Birth Defects,” Family Rejected Infanticide
• Pro-Life Leaders Want Abortion Clinic Closed Where Born Alive Babies Killed
• Congresswoman Holds Back Tears Urging Democrats to Ban Late Abortions

• Planned Parenthood Tells Raped Teen Sex Ed Could Have Stopped the Rape

• House Passes Bill Banning Late-Term Abortions After 20 Weeks
• Top Pro-Abortion Democrat Can’t Answer Simple Abortion Question

• Pro-Life Groups Applaud House for Passing Ban on Abortions After 20-Weeks
Why The Pro-Life Movement Must Support the Late-Term Abortion Ban
• MSNBC Anchor Doesn’t Care if Babies Feel Pain During Abortions
• We Must Vote to End Late-Term Abortions, Protect Unborn Babies

Adoptive Family Helps Raped Teen Whose Mom Pressured Her to Have Abortion
International and State Pro-Life News

Friday, June 21, 2013

The Amnesty Battle

Hold Nothing Back!
Massive Number of Donations Needed Now

Please donate today or click
Senate Final Votes Next Week
Our Side is Hammering Amnesty Supporters on Calls, Faxes, E-mails.
Dear Larry Killion,
Congratulations and thank you! We're completely drowning amnesty supporters! When it comes to making phone calls to Congress, sending faxes and writing e-mails, there's no competition.
I thank you with all my heart for everything you've done -- phone calls, faxes, donations, meetings. It's balanced $$ Billions spent by the other side. I know that many of you have spent hundreds of hours to defeat this monstrosity.
As great as the impact we're having, let me be perfectly frank with you: we cannot cross the finish line in this battle without a thunderous outpouring of donations, today.

Please donate today or click
Our side is fully charged for battle, because we're not fighting for special interests or cheap labor, like they are. We're fighting for the future of America and American workers. And the Senate is taking notice! Just read what the chairman of the Senate Republican Conference had to say:
"If you listen to the calls, the e-mails are offices are getting right now, the bombardment is pretty one-sided."
--Senator John Thune,
"GOP Support for Immigration Dissipating," Politico
Did you catch the name of that article? "GOP Support for Immigration Dissipating." See, you are having an effect on Washington! The pro-amnesty crowd may have hundreds of millions of dollars and an army of lobbyists, but we have the overwhelming support of the American people, and we're letting Congress know it.
Amnesty Proponents Play More Tricks.
Now, amnesty proponents know they have to shake up the game. The latest trick is an amendment by Sens. Corker (R-TN) and Hoeven (R-SD). The amendment solves nothing; the amnesty will still come before enforcement. It's simply a ruse to give the impression that the bill has changed since all of your calls and faxes were sent.
We now expect a vote on the Corker-Hoeven amendment on Monday and a final vote on Thursday. Both need 60 votes for passage. Before Thursday's vote, we need all our members to call their senators and tell them you still oppose amnesty before enforcement!

Marriage---What-Will-SCOTUS-Do ?

Tuesday, June 18, 2013

Jane Fonda as Nancy? NO! Boycot this film.

What a disgrace to Mrs. Nancy Reagan!
Boycott this movie!
we must not forget
This cannot go around too much. Those of us that were living in those years will never forget that she was a traitor and did a lot of damage to our boys.

She has now been chosen to play Nancy Reagan in her life story.
I am sending this one out because so many do not know this truth...and also because she was on 3 times this week
talking about her new book...
And how good she feels in her 70's.
She still does not know what she did wrong.
Her book just may not make the best seller list
if more people knew...
Barbara Walters said:
Thank you all. Many died in Vietnam for our freedoms.
I did not like Jane Fonda then and I don't like her now.
She can lead her present life the way she wants and perhaps
SHE can forget the past,
but we DO NOT have to stand by
without comment and see her "honored" as a
"Woman of the Century."

(I remember this well) For those who served and/or died....

and now President OBAMA wants to honor her......!!!!
In Memory of Lt. C. Thomsen Wieland who spent 100 days
at the Hanoi Hilton [Famous North Vietnam Prison]

This is for all the kids born in the 70's and after who do not know and didn't have to bear the burden that our fathers,
mothers and older brothers and sisters had to bear.

Jane Fonda is being honored as one of the '100
Women of the Century.'
Unfortunately, many have forgotten and still countless others
have never known how Ms. Fonda betrayed not only the idea of our country, but specific men who served and sacrificed
during the Vietnam War.

The first part of this is from an F-4E pilot.
The pilot's name is Jerry Driscoll, a River Rat.

In 1968, the former Commandant of the USAF Survival School
was a POW in Ho Lo Prison the 'Hanoi Hilton.'

Dragged from a stinking cesspit of a cell, cleaned, fed,
and dressed in clean PJ's, he was ordered to describe for a
visiting American 'Peace Activist' the 'lenient and humane
treatment' he'd received.

He spat at Ms. Fonda, was clubbed, and was dragged away. During the subsequent beating, he fell forward on to the camp
Commandant 's feet, which sent that officer berserk.

In 1978, the Air Force Colonel still suffered from double vision (which permanently ended his flying career) from the Commandant's frenzied application of a wooden baton.
From 1963-65, Col. Larry Carrigan was in the 47FW/DO (F-4E's). He spent 6 years in the 'Hanoi Hilton'...the first three
of which his family only knew he was 'missing in action'.

His wife lived on faith that he was still alive. His group, too, got the cleaned-up, fed and clothed treatment in preparation for a 'peace delegation' visit.
They, however, had time and devised a plan to get word to the world that they were alive and still survived. Each man
secreted a tiny piece of paper, with his Social Security Number on it, in the palm of his hand. When paraded before Ms. Fonda and a cameraman, she walked the line, shaking each man's
hand and asking little encouraging snippets like: 'Aren't you sorry you bombed babies?' and 'Are you grateful for the
humane treatment from your benevolent captors?'

Believing this HAD to be an act, they each palmed her their sliver of paper. She took them all without missing a beat...At the end of the line and once the camera stopped rolling, to the shocked disbelief of the POW's she turned to the officer in charge and handed him all the little pieces of paper...Three men died from the subsequent beatings.
Colonel Carrigan was almost number four but he survived, which is the only reason we know of her actions that day.
I was a civilian economic development adviser in Vietnam, and was captured by the North Vietnamese communists in South Vietnam in 1968, and held prisoner for over 5 years.
I spent 27 months in solitary confinement; one year in a cage in Cambodia; and one year in a 'black box' in Hanoi. My North Vietnamese captors deliberately poisoned and murdered a female missionary, a nurse in a leprosarium in Banme Thuot, South Vietnam, whom I buried in the jungle near the Cambodian border.
At one time, I weighed only about 90 lbs. (My normal weight is 170 lbs). We were Jane Fonda's 'war criminals...'
When Jane Fonda was in Hanoi, I was asked by the camp communist political officer if I would be willing to meet with her. I said yes, for I wanted to tell her about the real treatment we POWs received...and how different it was from the treatment purported by the North Vietnamese, and parroted by her as 'humane and lenient.'
Because of this, I spent three days on a rocky floor on my knees, with my arms outstretched with a large steel weight placed on my hands, and beaten with a bamboo cane.
I had the opportunity to meet with Jane Fonda soon after I was released. I asked her if she would be willing to debate me on TV. She never did answer me.
These first-hand experiences do not exemplify someone who
should be honored as part of '100 Years of Great Women.' Lest we forget...
'100 Years of Great Women' should never
include a traitor whose hands are covered with the blood of so many patriots.

There are few things I have strong visceral reactions to, but Hanoi Jane 's participation in blatant treason, is one of them.

Please take the time to forward to as many people as you possibly can. It will eventually end up on her computer and
she needs to know that we will never forget.

USAF 716 Maintenance Squadron,
Chief of Maintenance DSN: 875-6431 COMM: 883-6343