
SUPREME COURT RULES PRIVATE
GUN TRANSACTIONS SUBJECT TO
'STRAW PURCHASER' LAWS
GUN TRANSACTIONS SUBJECT TO
'STRAW PURCHASER' LAWS
Even When Used to Purchase
Firearms for Those Legally Eligible
Firearms for Those Legally Eligible
ABRAMSKI RULING GIVES NEW
LIFE TO OBAMA'S USURPATIONS,
ILLICIT BACKGROUND CHECKS
LIFE TO OBAMA'S USURPATIONS,
ILLICIT BACKGROUND CHECKS
SECURE OUR SECOND AMENDMENT
DEMAND CONGRESS FIGHT AGAINST
NATIONAL DATA REGISTRY, ATF TRICKS
NATIONAL DATA REGISTRY, ATF TRICKS

This
is EXACTLY the kind of broad infringement of Second Amendment
protections OBAMA, HOLDER, FEINSTEIN and BLOOMBERG have been desperate
to be handed by our corrupted courts… CONGRESS MUST SECURE OUR RIGHTS!
Justice
Elena Kagan writing the majority opinion argued that the enforcement of
the "straw purchase" law across lawful, private transactions was critical to giving meaning to the federal government's background checks and record keeping efforts to help law enforcement investigate crimes by tracing guns to their buyers. She said the gun control checks would mean little if a would-be gun owner-purchaser could evade them… even if the intended recipient of a firearm was a family member as happened in the Abramski case.
In
dissent, Justice Antonin Scalia was joined by the other court
conservatives – Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas
and Samuel Alito – in making the case that the language of the law does
not support making it a crime for one lawful gun owner to buy a gun for
another lawful gun owner.
In
this case, Abramski – a former police officer – was simply hoping to
get his uncle a good deal that he could not otherwise have gotten. He
had the support of twenty-six states while nine states and Washington,
D.C, filed papers supporting the Obama administration's
re-interpretation of the law.
No comments:
Post a Comment